Got multiple region searches.

Part of the improvements that will hopefully deploy successfully tomorrow is the ability to have multi-region searches.

So, there will be a new button that says "add to current" which, when pressed, will add data without clearing off the old data. This means you can have all the zip3s in Florida post next to all the zip3s in Georgia in case you want to compare between the two.

Currently, there is no way to differentiate between two searches on the same region (so if you select for all the zip3s in Georgia for one condition, and then add all the zip3s in Georgia for another condition... it will just overwrite the first set)... this is going to be part of a suite of improvements that allow for different sorts of pinpoints (pinwheel) and probably for selecting regions and legends.

But, I think it's neat and I hope you will too (and I actually got it working yesterday but spent a lot of yesterday and today debugging it, as I essentially had to rip apart the gmap-polygon project to get it working (and I branched before I did, thank goodness))

Cheers!

multisets

Gmap Polygon and Grid Viewer are now essentially doing cumulative searches... it's just not displaying them in any particular order... Thus tomorrow will be spent creating some updated pinpoint libraries (pinwheel), modifying the flot-plot screens, adding a "clear map" function... and filtering to make sure that empty data sets aren't added.

Also, there is a distinction for "empty set". If servers are queried and no data comes back, I'll show the pinpoints/polygons as empty. If, however, a search is run without any servers selected.... it will be considered an empty set and not added to the search tree.

Thus, when you first load the page, you'll get a map of the US, but there will be no pinpoints until you actually search for data. This behavior can change, of course, but for now it will help debug the behavior of how data is added.

Then, it's testing to see how it all behaves, and seeing whether a collection of collections will suffice or whether I will have to upgrade it to a map of some sort (a bit more complex to navigate, but probably much better "make sure these are in order" behavior)

Enterprise...

So, I was chatting with a friend yesterday and indicated that I was a bit sad because the next set of changes (modifying GmapPolygon to hold multiple sets of polygons/indicators and writing a new polygon color handler that allows for URL's to be set) will sort of make things ugly and a bit more confusing and threatens to mottle the design patterns even more...

The friend spake (and I paraphrase): "Don't worry about it, it's enterprise code. You go in expecting A... and you end up making A, which eventually needs B after the user sees it and decides it wants B-esque features... but you don't have the time to completely remake it into B, so you make it into a mashup of A and C which works just as good but is not as pretty. So just be happy that A-C is doing good enough and make it into B if you have time before the next deadline." We then went on to discuss how the whole idea that code as a start-do-end thing is more myth than reality... as specifications change and user wishes change and sometimes you change from linux to windows or the tool you need only works with a certain version &c &c.

So yes, The next step is going to be changing the GmapPolygon and the Grid Viewer to work with indexed collections of polygons instead of just one collection of polygons. This will allow for sequential searches (search for all the fever in the US... now search for all the nausea in the US... now search for all the poison-related cellulitis in the US... now do those again for all of Texas...) to be maintained and shown simultaneously on the map until they are explicitly cleared. This means the pinpoint visualizations will need to be changed so that later searches don't show up on top of the older searches (right now I am thinking of using rotating pins... so sequential searches start filling in a pin-wheel). The flot-plotting mechanics are also going to need to change a bit to search on region type, name, and index (thus, it knows to look for the 3rd search or the 2nd search). Eventually the selection mechanisms might also be tweaked to become more intuitive or allow for more specific searches... but right now it's just about getting multiple searches on a map.

I'm sure it will actually not be as ugly or unintuitive as I fear when I'm done, but it is a lot of changes in the name of niftiness,

Cheers!